top of page
Happy Family

Child Custody

On August 13, 2024, a new custody statute was put into effect for the State of Pennsylvania in accordance with "Kayden's Law." While custody is still determined by considering what is in the best interests of the child, the new statute delineates factors to be considered by the court in making that determination. Those factors include:

​

§ 5328. Factors to consider when awarding custody.

​

(a) Factors.--In ordering any form of custody, the court shall determine the best interest of the child by considering all relevant factors, giving substantial weighted consideration to the factors specified under paragraphs (1), (2), (2.1) and (2.2) which affect the safety of the child, including the following:

 

(1) Which party is more likely to ensure the safety of the child.

​

(2) The present and past abuse committed by a party or member of the party's household, which may include past or current protection from abuse or sexual violence protection orders where there has been a finding of abuse.

 

(2.1) The information set forth in section 5329.1 (a) (relating to consideration of child abuse and involvement with protective services).

​

(2.2) Violent or assaultive behavior committed by a party.

 

(2.3) Which party is more likely to encourage and permit frequent and continuing contact between the child and another party if contact is consistent with the safety needs of the child.

 

(3) The parental duties performed by each party on behalf of the child.

 

(4) The need for stability and continuity in the child's education, family life and community life, except if changes are necessary to protect the safety of the child or a party.

​

(5) The availability of extended family.

 

(6) The child's sibling relationships.

 

(7) The well-reasoned preference of the child, based on the child's developmental stage, maturity and judgment.

 

(8) The attempts of a party to turn the child against the other party, except in cases of abuse where reasonable safety measures are necessary to protect the safety of the child. A party's reasonable concerns for the safety of the child and the party's reasonable efforts to protect the child shall not be considered attempts to turn the child against the other party. A child's deficient or negative relationship with a party shall not be presumed to be caused by the other party.

 

(9) Which party is more likely to maintain a loving, stable, consistent and nurturing relationship with the child adequate for the child's emotional needs.

 

(10) Which party is more likely to attend to the daily physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special needs of the child.

 

(11) The proximity of the residences of the parties.

 

(12) Each party's availability to care for the child or ability to make appropriate child-care arrangements.

 

(13) The level of conflict between the parties and the willingness and ability of the parties to cooperate with one another. A party's effort to protect a child or self from abuse by another party is not evidence of unwillingness or inability to cooperate with that party.

 

(14) The history of drug or alcohol abuse of a party or member of a party's household.

 

(15) The mental and physical condition of a party or member of a party's household.

 

(16) Any other relevant factor.

 

(a.1) Exception.--A factor under subsection (a) shall not be adversely weighed against a party if the circumstances related to the factor were in response to abuse or necessary to protect the child or the abused party from harm and the party alleging abuse does not pose a risk to the safety of the child at the time of the custody hearing. Temporary housing instability as a result of abuse shall not be considered against the party alleging abuse.

 

(a.2) Determination.--No single factor under subsection (a) shall by itself be determinative in the awarding of custody. The court shall examine the totality of the circumstances, giving weighted consideration to the factors that affect the safety of the child, when issuing a custody order that is in the best interest of the child.

Different Types of Custody

Partial custody in Pennsylvania is defined as the right to take possession of a child away from the custodial parent for a certain period of time.

​

Physical custody is defined as the actual physical possession and control of a child.

​

Shared custody is defined as an order awarding shared legal or shared physical custody or both of a child in such a way as to assure the child of frequent and continuing contact with and physical access to both parents.

We Can Help

If you would like to discuss your custody matter with an attorney, you can contact SDS Family Law Group. Our office in Forty Fort can be reached at 570-820-9800 or, if you prefer, you can schedule an appointment online.

bottom of page